Blurting In A & L
PRAGMATICS
Author: Art & Language Posted: 08.06.2001; 18:40:30 Topic: PRAGMATICS Msg #: 278 (top msg in thread) Enclosure: Prev/Next: 277/279 Reads: 11181
278 PRAGMATICS You might say that we are interested in what a statement obtains in our proceedings/activities; we are not very concerned with its 'static' (native) cognitive value.-> A priori 26; Ambiguity 3, 4; Art enquiry 46; Blik 75; Categorical scheme 82; Context 95, 99; Conversational matrix 116, 117; Falsification 131, 132; Heuristic 135, 142, 147, 154, 158; Intersubjectivity 187; Learning 205; Problematic Art & Language 289; Proceeding 293; Work 394; Work, pragmatics of 407, 408;
& Ambiguity 10; Context 98, 106; Education 120; Heuristic 156;