Blurting In A & L
CONVERSATIONAL MATRIX
Author: Art & Language Posted: 08.06.2001; 18:09:21 Topic: CONVERSATIONAL MATRIX Msg #: 116 (top msg in thread) Enclosure: Prev/Next: 115/117 Reads: 31089
116 CONVERSATIONAL MATRIX On our reasons (intuitions) for reading Kuhn/Popper being more important than what we read in Kuhn/Popper: in the conversational matrix it's not what a speaker says but that a speaker says, and his attitude behind his saying that.-> Beliefs 72, 73; Learning 210; Logical 221; Work 378, 395;
& Annotating 18, 19; Beliefs 69; Conversational matrix 118; Semantic field 323;